1945
CEPAL Review No. 31, April 1987
  • E-ISSN: 16840348

Abstract

The issue of the relationship between planning and the market has given rise to fruitless theoretical contention over the relative merits of central planning versus a laissez-faire market. At the practical level, this disagreement has manifested itself in sharp swings in policy, which at times have favoured State intervention while mistrusting private enterprise, and at other times have curtailed State action on the grounds that it is inherently ineffective and inappropriate. The author argues that one of the major lessons to be learned from the region’s postwar economic experiences is that a correct balance must be struck between the market and State action on the basis of an objective analysis of the strong and weak points of each.

Related Subject(s): Economic and Social Development

You do not have access to article level metrics. Please click here to request access

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/16840348/1987/31/15
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudW4taWxpYnJhcnkub3JnLw==