1945
Volume 2024, Issue 142
  • E-ISSN: 16840348

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse foreign capital and national development in the debate between Celso Furtado and Maria da Conceição Tavares between 1964 and 1982. To this end, it investigates how Furtado’s analytical radicalization, following the 1964 coup d’état in Brazil, enabled him to make a pioneering interpretation of the transnationalization of capital in Latin America and the Caribbean, despite Tavares’ criticism of his stagnationist thesis. Moreover, although Tavares was considered to have won the debate with Furtado, this study reveals how her approach failed to define the limits of peripheral industrialization when capital in the region was under foreign control.

Sustainable Development Goals:
Related Subject(s): Economic and Social Development

You do not have access to article level metrics. Please click here to request access

/content/journals/16840348/2024/142/5
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudW4taWxpYnJhcnkub3JnLw==