1945
CEPAL Review No. 75, December 2001
  • E-ISSN: 16840348

Abstract

There is something paradoxical about the rise and fall -maybe we could speak about a renewed rise- of Raul Prebisch’s thinking on what in the early years of his intellectual life would have been called primary producer economies. In parallel with what had happened with development economics at large, by the early 1960s or so his thinking was being progressively dismissed both in public and academic discourse.

Related Subject(s): Economic and Social Development

You do not have access to article level metrics. Please click here to request access

/content/journals/16840348/2001/75/4
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudW4taWxpYnJhcnkub3JnLw==