1945

Abstract

Lack of growth limits poverty reduction while poverty increases conflict risk. Institutional failure and other factors seem to cause both growth failure and civil war. The greed explanation for conflict is common in cross-country econometric investigation, despite its dubious role in directly causing civil war. The relationship between natural resource revenues and conflict onset works through other mechanisms, such as a weakening social contract and withering state capacity. The grievance explanation for contemporary civil war is supported by detailed case studies where horizontal inequality is important. Economic deconstruction following war should therefore be pro-poor and address horizontal inequalities engendering conflict.

Sustainable Development Goals:
Related Subject(s): Economic and Social Development

You do not have access to article level metrics. Please click here to request access

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/25206656/43
Loading
  • Published online: 30 Jun 2007
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error